Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Holland

Citations

  • 543 A.2d 1068
  • 518 Pa. 405
  • 1988 Pa. LEXIS 163

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court did not err by allowing the prosecution to question prospective jurors regarding their ability to announce a death sentence in an appropriate case
  • finding that there “must be some relationship between the law upon which an instruction is required and the evidence presented at trial,” and concluding that “there was no basis in the record to support charging the jury on the voluntariness of [Petitioner’s] confessions”
  • preconceived beliefs or attitudes regarding imposition of death penalty provides proper grounds to dismiss prospective jurors for cause
  • preconceived beliefs or attitudes regarding imposition of death penalty provides proper grounds to dismiss prospective jurors for cause
  • where capital defendant did not testify at sentencing hearing, prosecutor’s comment on defendant’s failure to show remorse was not error
  • where capital defendant did not testify at sentencing hearing, prosecutor's comment on defendant's failure to show remorse was not error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Zappala, Papadakos, Stout

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.