Commonwealth v. Hoffman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Statement that the suppression order substantially handicapped the prosecution properly invoked the jurisdiction of Superior Court to entertain the appeal from an otherwise interlocutory order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. James
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-05-29· cited 99×
• Commonwealth v. Elliott
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-08-05· cited 75×
• Commonwealth v. Slovikosky
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-05-26· cited 10×
• Commonwealth v. Dubin
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-10-25· cited 10×
• Commonwealth v. Whiting
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-11-09· cited 7×
• Commonwealth v. Valle-Velez
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-05-27· cited 6×
• Commonwealth v. James
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-11-10· cited 3×
• Commonwealth v. Proctor
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-01-19· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Massiah v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1964-05-18· cited 3,189×
• Maine v. Moulton
  Supreme Court· 1985-12-10· cited 1,260×
• Kuhlmann v. Wilson
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-26· cited 1,205×
• United States v. Henry
  Supreme Court· 1980-06-16· cited 1,013×
• Commonwealth v. Dugger
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-01-09· cited 417×