Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 6/30/1899
Commonwealth v. Hilton
Citations
- 174 Mass. 29
- 45 L.R.A. 475
- 54 N.E. 362
- 1899 Mass. LEXIS 860
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- selectmen of a town may prohibit the digging of clams by nonresidents of the town
- it is not to be assumed that the Legislature would grant exclusive fishing rights except to promote the public interest
- it is not to be assumed that the Legislature would grant exclusive fishing rights except to promote the public interest
- fish, including shellfish, are protectable natural resources of the citizens of Massachusetts and of each community therein
- Legislature may grant exclusive fishing rights
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Knowlton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Harper v. GallowaySupreme Court of Florida· 1909-06-15· cited 75×
- McDowell v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1989-12-22· cited 66×
- Davis v. Zoning Board of ChathamMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2001-08-27· cited 53×
- Takahashi v. Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court· 1947-10-17· cited 46×
- Commonwealth v. TartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1990-08-08· cited 25×
- Commonwealth v. City of Newport NewsSupreme Court of Virginia· 1932-06-16· cited 23×
- Alsos v. KendallOregon Supreme Court· 1924-06-17· cited 20×
- Town of Wellfleet v. GlazeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1988-07-20· cited 18×
- State v. NortonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1975-02-26· cited 16×
- State v. LemarSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1952-04-10· cited 15×
- Lee v. City of LynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1916-03-01· cited 10×
- Dapson v. DalyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1926-10-13· cited 9×
- State v. AshmanTennessee Supreme Court· 1910-12-15· cited 9×
- Barlow v. Town of WarehamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1988-01-06· cited 8×
- Toomer v. WitsellE.D. South Carolina· 1947-09-13· cited 8×
- State v. AlleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1971-03-05· cited 7×
- Commonwealth v. HowesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1930-01-16· cited 7×
- People v. SetunskyMichigan Supreme Court· 1910-06-06· cited 7×
- Brownsville Shrimp Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1947-11-20· cited 5×
- Commonwealth v. BraggMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1952-01-31· cited 3×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blake v. McClungSupreme Court· 1898-12-12· cited 262×
- McCready v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1877-04-30· cited 261×
- Corfield v. CoryellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania· 1823-04-15· cited 214×
- Manchester v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1891-03-23· cited 170×
- Wharton v. WiseSupreme Court· 1894-04-23· cited 44×
- Burnham v. WebsterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1809-05-15· cited 41×
- Commonwealth v. VincentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1871-11-15· cited 30×
- Proctor v. WellsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1869-11-15· cited 13×
- Nickerson v. BrackettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1813-06-15· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.