Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Hill

Citations

  • 549 A.2d 199
  • 378 Pa. Super. 562
  • 1988 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2967

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \It is well settled that omissions of facts in prior statements do not render them inconsistent statements that may be used for impeachment purposes at trial.\
  • out-of-court statement to explain course of conduct is not - 14 - J-A12015-17 hearsay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Olszewski, Kelly, Hester

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.