Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Hill

Citations

  • 385 N.E.2d 253
  • 377 Mass. 59
  • 1979 Mass. LEXIS 1036

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that Balthazar’s holding was “rooted in constitutional considerations” and granting defendant new trial based on “fundamental fairness”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hennessey, Braucher, Kaplan, Liacos, Abrams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.