Commonwealth v. Hicks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding statement that was merely cumulative, which did not add helpful facts or strengthen claim, is not exculpatory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Lambert
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-12-18· cited 97×
• Commonwealth v. Gordon
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-06-30· cited 74×
• Commonwealth v. Watson
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-07-18· cited 20×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brady v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
• Commonwealth v. Black
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-08-17· cited 120×
• Commonwealth v. Gee
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-04-07· cited 119×
• United States v. Jack Kaplan
  Third Circuit· 1977-04-11· cited 70×
• Commonwealth v. Martin
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-11-26· cited 65×
• Commonwealth v. Rose
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-01-24· cited 41×
• Commonwealth v. Wilder
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-05-13· cited 25×