United States v. Jack Kaplan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting a Brady claim where the withheld information was disclosed during before the prosecution rested because “the exculpatory documents were brought to the jury’s attention”
• no violation because exculpatory documents brought to jury’s attention; “delayed disclosure by the prosecution is not per se reversible error”
• “A delayed disclosure [of exculpatory evidence pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963)] by the prosecution is not per se reversible error”
• \[W]e disapprove and discourage a practice of delayed production of Brady materials.\
• “[W]e disapprove and discourage a practice of delayed production of Brady materials.”
• “The rule of Brady v. Maryland is founded on the constitutional requirement of a fair trial, binding on both state and federal courts. It is not a rule of discovery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).