Commonwealth v. Healey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• construing the meaning of the statutory language “visibly possessed a firearm”
• mandatory minimum sentence applied even where defendant fired a shotgun through a closed door because use of the firearm produced a visible effect
• possession of deadly weapon for purposes of weapon enhancement of sentencing may be proved by circumstantial evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Galindes
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-11-14· cited 147×
• Commonwealth v. Alford
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-07-26· cited 63×
• Commonwealth v. Wooten
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-08-10· cited 48×
• Commonwealth v. McKeithan
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-01-31· cited 23×
• Commonwealth v. Townsend
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-02-08· cited 15×
• Commonwealth v. Gonzales
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-02-03· cited 12×
• Commonwealth v. Sheppard
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-11-25· cited 9×
• Commonwealth v. Grimmitt
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-07-14· cited 7×
• Commonwealth v. Woodlyn
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-09-06· cited 5×
• Commonwealth v. Wooten
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-12-13· cited 2×