Commonwealth v. Hastings

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a restitution order for the economic loss of a 1984 vehicle could not be based simply on the cost of buying a different make and model of a 1992 vehicle to replace it
• equating “economic loss” with financial loss that includes lost earnings, out-of-pocket expenses, and replacement costs, but not pain and suffering
• equating “economic loss” with financial loss so as to encompass lost earnings, out of pocket expenses, and replacement costs, but not pain and suffering

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Cromwell
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2002-11-14· cited 25×
• Commonwealth v. Casanova
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2006-03-13· cited 16×
• Commonwealth v. Buckley
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2016-09-08· cited 10×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Novelty Bias Binding Co. v. Shevrin
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1961-06-07· cited 69×
• Commonwealth v. Nawn
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1985-02-07· cited 51×
• Commonwealth v. Rotonda
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2001-05-21· cited 32×