Novelty Bias Binding Co. v. Shevrin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that three year restriction in noncompete agreement was reasonable because former employer would be particularly vulnerable to a competitor who had the employee in his service during that time period
• former employee’s agreement not to compete given as partial restitution for funds embezzled from employer
• covenant not to compete covering twenty-six named States, signed as part of defendant’s restitution in criminal case, not unreasonable
• “What is reasonable depends on the facts in each case.”
• non-compete covenant may be enforced “provided it is necessary for the protection of the employer, is reasonably limited in time and space, and is consonant with the public interest[;] [wjhat is reasonable depends on the facts in each case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).