Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 4/19/1995
Commonwealth v. Harris
Citations
- 658 A.2d 392
- 442 Pa. Super. 6
- 1995 Pa. Super. LEXIS 924
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating the present sense impression exception does not require that the comments be made to another person also present at the scene; rather, the comments may be made over the telephone
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cavanaugh, Meewen, Rowley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. PeterkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-07-25· cited 215×
- Commonwealth v. PronkoskieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-03-23· cited 94×
- Commonwealth v. ShawSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-07-02· cited 59×
- Commonwealth v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-06-07· cited 33×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.