Commonwealth v. Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying a motion for mistrial where alleged prejudicial statement was “an isolated passing reference volunteered by the witness and not responsive to the question.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Lark
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-11-22· cited 17×
• Commonwealth v. Ewell
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-08-19· cited 5×

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Edwards v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
• Beck v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1964-11-23· cited 5,133×
• Commonwealth v. Jones
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-07-01· cited 156×
• Commonwealth v. Rose
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-04-12· cited 50×
• Commonwealth v. Powers
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-03-16· cited 49×
• Commonwealth v. Silvis
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-12-20· cited 46×
• Commonwealth v. Brooks
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-10-08· cited 35×
• United States v. Peter Vella
  Third Circuit· 1977-09-19· cited 34×
• Commonwealth v. Humphreys
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-06-27· cited 29×
• Commonwealth v. Bartlett
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-10-01· cited 27×
• Commonwealth v. Grandison
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-11-17· cited 17×
• Commonwealth v. Bunting
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-02-20· cited 15×
• Commonwealth v. Grant
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-06-02· cited 14×
• Commonwealth v. Bynum
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-04-12· cited 10×
• Commonwealth v. Taliaferro
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-12-14· cited 8×