Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Hampton

Citations

  • 718 A.2d 1250
  • 1998 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2726

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that appointment of counsel is necessary despite the apparent untimeliness of petition
  • holding that appointment of counsel is necessary despite the apparent untimeliness of petition
  • holding that counsel is to be appointed in a PCRA case to adequately and fully develop legal issues by filing an amended petition precisely because a pro se petitioner is not learned in the law
  • finding proceedings effectively -6- J-S53011-15 uncounseled and in violation of the representation requirement “when appointed counsel fails to amend an inarticulately drafted pro se [PCRA] petition, or fails otherwise to participate meaningfully[.]”
  • “counsel’s inaction deprived the petitioner the opportunity of legally trained counsel to advance his position in acceptable legal terms”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sole, Johnson, Hester

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.