Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 9/15/1998
Commonwealth v. Hampton
Citations
- 718 A.2d 1250
- 1998 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2726
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that appointment of counsel is necessary despite the apparent untimeliness of petition
- holding that appointment of counsel is necessary despite the apparent untimeliness of petition
- holding that counsel is to be appointed in a PCRA case to adequately and fully develop legal issues by filing an amended petition precisely because a pro se petitioner is not learned in the law
- finding proceedings effectively -6- J-S53011-15 uncounseled and in violation of the representation requirement “when appointed counsel fails to amend an inarticulately drafted pro se [PCRA] petition, or fails otherwise to participate meaningfully[.]”
- “counsel’s inaction deprived the petitioner the opportunity of legally trained counsel to advance his position in acceptable legal terms”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sole, Johnson, Hester
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. HenkelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-04-11· cited 554×
- Commonwealth v. KaranicolasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-11-12· cited 257×
- Commonwealth v. FriendSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-03-30· cited 238×
- Commonwealth v. PerezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-05-21· cited 122×
- Commonwealth v. KutnyakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-08-13· cited 114×
- Commonwealth v. KubisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-09-19· cited 92×
- Commonwealth v. GonzalezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-09-09· cited 70×
- Commonwealth v. QuailSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-03-24· cited 56×
- Commonwealth v. PowellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-12-04· cited 45×
- Commonwealth v. GloverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-08-04· cited 42×
- Commonwealth v. PriovolosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-01-27· cited 40×
- Commonwealth v. McLaurinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-05-25· cited 35×
- Commonwealth v. WhiteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-04-04· cited 32×
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-11-14· cited 21×
- Commonwealth v. MaloneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-04-30· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-12-26· cited 2×
- Commonwealth v. PlummerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-05-08· cited 1×
- Com. v. PRIVOLOSSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-01-27
- Commonwealth v. Small, E., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-10-01
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. FinleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-10-31· cited 4,104×
- Commonwealth v. FieroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-07-07· cited 73×
- Commonwealth v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-07-08· cited 65×
- Commonwealth v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-11-14· cited 64×
- Commonwealth v. SangriccoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-05-30· cited 46×
- Commonwealth v. LindseySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-12-30· cited 24×
- Commonwealth v. CarrierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-07-02· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. KaufmannSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-06-07· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. PetersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-09-25· cited 16×
- Commonwealth v. OllieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-09-24· cited 16×
- Commonwealth v. BartonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-03-25· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. LuckettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-09-23· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. Van AllenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-10-09· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. HinesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-05-22· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.