Commonwealth v. Hallock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[w]hen issues are not properly raised and developed in briefs, when the briefs are wholly inadequate to present specific issues for review, a court will not consider the merits thereof.”
• providing that this Court will not consider issues that are not raised and developed in briefs
• “We decline to become [the] appellant’s counsel. When issues are not properly raised and developed in briefs, when the briefs are wholly inadequate to present specific issues for review, a court will not consider the merits thereof.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Baker
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-12-19· cited 161×
• Commonwealth v. Martz
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-06-06· cited 97×
• Commonwealth v. Appleby
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-08-19· cited 16×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Yager
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-11-07· cited 175×
• Commonwealth v. Sanford
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-04-30· cited 160×
• Smith v. Smith
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-12-17· cited 84×
• Commonwealth v. Quinlan
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-03-20· cited 48×
• Commonwealth v. Young
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-05-02· cited 35×
• Commonwealth v. Drew
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-06-12· cited 32×
• Commonwealth v. Stoppie
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-12-21· cited 25×
• Commonwealth v. Buehl
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-03-13· cited 21×