Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2/25/2004

Commonwealth v. Guy

Citations

441 Mass. 96
803 N.E.2d 707
2004 Mass. LEXIS 120

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

it is well established that the “jury are permitted to infer malice from the use of a dangerous weapon”
“Prosecutors must limit the scope of their closing arguments to facts in evidence and the fair inferences that may be drawn therefrom”
“Prosecutors must limit the scope of their closing arguments to facts in evidence and the fair inferences that may be drawn therefrom”
“The jury, as the finders of fact, were free to reject the defendant’s version of events in its entirety”
\Prosecutors must limit the scope of their closing arguments to facts in evidence and the fair inferences that may be drawn therefrom\
“The prohibition of Doyle applies only to police interrogations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ireland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.