Commonwealth v. Green

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the public defender’s office of a county was, “by its very nature, a law firm,” and that a conflict of interest existed because of representation by co-defendants by the same county office; the criminal defendant was therefore entitled to a new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lentz
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1994-10-12· cited 173×
• Duvall v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-05-15· cited 20×
• Graves v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1993-01-27· cited 19×
• Austin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-07-27· cited 19×
• Commonwealth v. Davis
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-01-11· cited 18×
• Commonwealth v. Sims
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-05-21· cited 16×
• In Re Recker
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2009-03-11· cited 2×
• Commonwealth v. Breighner
  Adams County Court of Common Pleas· 1993-05-04