Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1/4/1993
Commonwealth v. Goodwin
Citations
- 605 N.E.2d 827
- 414 Mass. 88
- 1993 Mass. LEXIS 2
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- sentencing judge in criminal case may consider reliable hearsay information about defendant’s character, behavior, and background, including arrests and criminal conduct of which defendant not convicted
- “sentence should reflect the judge’s careful assessment of several goals: punishment, deterrence, protection of the public, and rehabilitation”
- “In making th[e] [sentencing] assessment, the judge may consider many factors which would not be relevant at trial including hearsay information about the defendant’s character, behavior, and background.”
- the judge “gave the defendant the opportunity to challenge or rebut the information”
- “it is recognized that recidivism rates among child molesters are particularly high”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Greaney, Lynch, Nolan, Wilkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. WoodwardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1998-06-16· cited 111×
- Commonwealth v. StuckichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2008-01-16· cited 108×
- Commonwealth v. D'AmourMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1999-01-27· cited 87×
- Commonwealth v. MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2002-03-22· cited 73×
- Commonwealth v. CoryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2009-08-18· cited 61×
- Commonwealth v. PowerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1995-05-18· cited 57×
- Commonwealth v. GoodwinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2010-09-17· cited 53×
- Commonwealth v. LapointeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2001-12-11· cited 40×
- Commonwealth v. RodriguezMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2001-09-21· cited 29×
- Commonwealth v. NunezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2006-02-09· cited 28×
- Commonwealth v. BruzzeseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2002-08-26· cited 25×
- Commonwealth v. Keon K.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2007-10-25· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. HealyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2008-11-04· cited 16×
- Commonwealth v. RivasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2013-08-09· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. AlvesMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2001-02-05· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. HenriquezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2003-10-08· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. GuzmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2014-08-25· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. LenderMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2006-05-18· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. JonesMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2008-04-16· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. JuntaMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2004-09-23· cited 11×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1949-06-06· cited 2,766×
- United States v. Leon Wilbur TerryFourth Circuit· 1990-10-16· cited 300×
- United States v. Francis P. TraceyFirst Circuit· 1982-04-15· cited 95×
- Commonwealth v. ColemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1984-01-23· cited 80×
- Cepulonis v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1981-10-08· cited 58×
- Commonwealth v. LeBlancMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1976-05-04· cited 51×
- United States v. John M. Papajohn, Jr.Eighth Circuit· 1983-03-11· cited 48×
- Commonwealth v. CelesteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1970-12-07· cited 39×
- Commonwealth v. SettipaneMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1977-10-24· cited 25×
- Commonwealth v. FranksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1977-04-28· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. FergusonMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1991-05-14· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. CoullMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1985-07-10· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.