United States v. John M. Papajohn, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying evidentiary hearing because “[t]he transcript of the sentencing hearing clearly shows that appellant was given and took the opportunity to reiterate his position that he was merely a middleman rather than the central figure in the conspiracy”
• information which a sentenc ing court may consider includes criminal activity for which the defendant has not been prosecuted
• information which a sentencing court may consider includes criminal activity for which the defendant has not been prosecuted
• due process does not mandate an evidentiary hearing to establish the accuracy of a presentence investigation report before such report can be considered by district court for sentencing purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).