Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Gillespie

Citations

  • 103 A.3d 115
  • 2014 Pa. Super. 245
  • 2014 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3941
  • 2014 WL 5421019

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding search of item placed in plastic bin when defendant proceeded through magnetometer
  • person does not have a “reasonable expectation of absolute privacy” in certain places “where all members of the public [are] subject to a routine search”
  • “where regimes of suspicionless searches or seizures are designed to serve governmental special needs that exceed the normal demands of law enforcement, they will be upheld in certain instances” (citation and quotation marks omitted)
  • courthouse deputy opened pill bottle during screening

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gantman, Bender, Lazarus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.