Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 11/18/1986
Commonwealth v. Frey
Citations
- 517 A.2d 1265
- 512 Pa. 557
- 1986 Pa. LEXIS 919
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- [stating that] “[w]e have long recognized that post-verdict accomplice testimony must be viewed with a jaundiced eye.”
- finding that statement by co-defendant after he had been sentenced for his participation in the crime “raises a significant question as to its reliability”
- rejecting after-discovered evidence claim on basis of statement containing information that defendant would have known since the time of the crime
- rejecting claim that fellow conspirator's statement was newly-discovered evidence: “If the events recounted . . . actually occurred, [the] appellant was obviously aware of them since [the] appellant was a party to those events”
- after-discovered evidence is that which comes to light after trial, and about which defendant was unaware
- “We have long recognized that post-verdict accomplice testimony must be viewed with a jaundiced eye.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Hutchinson, Zappala, Papadakos
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Roderick Herman Frey v. Thomas A. Fulcomer, Warden, State Correctional Institution at HuntingdonThird Circuit· 1997-12-30· cited 85×
- Commonwealth v. FreySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-02-03· cited 81×
- Roderick Herman Frey v. Thomas A. Fulcomer, Warden, State Correctional Institution at HuntingdonThird Circuit· 1992-09-15· cited 75×
- Commonwealth v. MasonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-11-24· cited 48×
- Commonwealth v. KohanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-05-23· cited 32×
- Commonwealth v. McClucasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-09-30· cited 21×
- Commonwealth v. BonaccursoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-04-22· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. NoceroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-11-16· cited 14×
- Frey v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1987-04-06
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. FreySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-04-13· cited 262×
- Cox v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1984-10-29· cited 180×
- Commonwealth v. TervalonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-10-03· cited 122×
- Commonwealth v. Sitkin's Junk Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1963-10-09· cited 97×
- Commonwealth v. MostellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-12-20· cited 90×
- Commonwealth v. TreftzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-01-29· cited 71×
- Commonwealth v. ChristySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-09-25· cited 66×
- Commonwealth v. ValderramaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-07-14· cited 54×
- Parisi v. PHILA. ZONING BD. OF ADJUST.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1958-06-30· cited 36×
- Frey v. FrancisSupreme Court· 1984-10-29· cited 31×
- Commonwealth v. LeskoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-11-12· cited 29×
- Parisi v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1958-06-30· cited 28×
- Commonwealth v. SanabriaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-02-01· cited 6×
- Commonwealth v. RyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-03-21· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.