Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Frey

Citations

  • 517 A.2d 1265
  • 512 Pa. 557
  • 1986 Pa. LEXIS 919

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • [stating that] “[w]e have long recognized that post-verdict accomplice testimony must be viewed with a jaundiced eye.”
  • finding that statement by co-defendant after he had been sentenced for his participation in the crime “raises a significant question as to its reliability”
  • rejecting after-discovered evidence claim on basis of statement containing information that defendant would have known since the time of the crime
  • rejecting claim that fellow conspirator's statement was newly-discovered evidence: “If the events recounted . . . actually occurred, [the] appellant was obviously aware of them since [the] appellant was a party to those events”
  • after-discovered evidence is that which comes to light after trial, and about which defendant was unaware
  • “We have long recognized that post-verdict accomplice testimony must be viewed with a jaundiced eye.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Hutchinson, Zappala, Papadakos

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.