Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 4/29/2003

Commonwealth v. Franklin

Citations

823 A.2d 906
2003 Pa. Super. 165
2003 Pa. Super. LEXIS 877

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that, where an Appellant’s argument rests on evidence in the record, he must make appropriate references to the record in his argument to sufficiently develop and preserve his argument for review
“A brief containing argument like this has the same result as filing no brief at all.”
“These rules ensure that a brief serves its purpose-to permit the appellate court to address the assignments on their merits.”
“These rules ensure that a brief serves its purpose-to permit the appellate court to address the assignments on their merits.”
“These rules ensure that a brief serves its purpose-to permit the appellate court to address the assignments on their merits.”
“[T]he ‘equal protection clause and the due process incorporation of the sixth amendment require that an indigent be afforded the assistance of legal counsel at every critical stage throughout the criminal process.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bender, Olszewski, Cavanaugh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.