Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1/29/1976
Commonwealth v. Fowler
Citations
- 352 A.2d 17
- 466 Pa. 198
- 1976 Pa. LEXIS 463
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- In a thirteen-picture display eleven pictures, excluding the accused’s, were mug shots. In an eleven-picture display only the accused was shown in a polaroid snapshot.
- suggestive identification; examination of various factors reveals no independent basis for the in-court identification
- lineup identification tainted by repetitive display of defendant’s photograph to witness prior to lineup
- lineup identification tainted by repetitive display of defendant's photograph to witness prior to lineup
- black, dark suit, slender build, aged 19-21, deemed too general
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Manderino, Nix
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. SmallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-11-01· cited 320×
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-10-17· cited 303×
- Commonwealth v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-03-13· cited 237×
- Commonwealth v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-06-17· cited 216×
- Commonwealth v. RodgersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-04-28· cited 127×
- Commonwealth v. PotterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-03-23· cited 83×
- Commonwealth v. SilverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-09-28· cited 71×
- Commonwealth v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-11-09· cited 66×
- Commonwealth v. SextonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-05-01· cited 64×
- Commonwealth v. ConnollySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-04-28· cited 45×
- Commonwealth v. BoganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-10-05· cited 44×
- Commonwealth v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-05-20· cited 37×
- Commonwealth v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-04-06· cited 36×
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-12-29· cited 36×
- Commonwealth v. GriffinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-10-19· cited 33×
- Commonwealth v. FloydSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-07-08· cited 31×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-01-18· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. HurdSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-07-12· cited 29×
- Commonwealth v. RozplochiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-06-26· cited 29×
- Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-12-29· cited 28×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 8,442×
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court· 1972-12-06· cited 7,056×
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-03-18· cited 6,700×
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 6,066×
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 3,797×
- Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1970-06-22· cited 1,808×
- Foster v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-04-01· cited 1,048×
- United States of America Ex Rel. Clay Thomas v. State of New JerseyThird Circuit· 1973-01-23· cited 49×
- Government of Virgin Islands v. NavarroThird Circuit· 1975-03-18· cited 48×
- United States v. Ivie Wily Higgins, A/K/A Harry SmithThird Circuit· 1972-03-28· cited 47×
- United States v. William Edward Zeiler (Two Cases)Third Circuit· 1971-09-15· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. BurtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-07-02· cited 25×
- United States v. Allen Coades, in No. 72-1321, and John Coades. Appeal of John Coades, in No. 72-1322Third Circuit· 1972-12-11· cited 16×
- United States v. Martin William MonteerEighth Circuit· 1975-04-29· cited 13×
- United States v. Clarence Holiday, in No. 71-1456. Appeal of William HolidayThird Circuit· 1972-03-24· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.