Commonwealth v. Floyd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• pre-trial identifica tion is not an exception to the general prohibition against hearsay evidence and therefore inadmissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Thomas McCandless v. Donald T. Vaughn the Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania District Attorney for Philadelphia County
  Third Circuit· 1999-03-30· cited 556×
• State v. Ildefonso
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1992-02-10· cited 64×
• Commonwealth v. Patterson
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-04-06· cited 36×
• Commonwealth v. Floyd
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-09-25· cited 14×
• Commonwealth v. Carroll
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-08-11· cited 12×
• Commonwealth v. Brady
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-01-18· cited 6×
• Commonwealth v. Sherman
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-02-01· cited 4×
• Commonwealth v. Faust
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-11-17· cited 3×
• State v. Tafokitau
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2004-03-19· cited 1×
• Pickron v. Jacobs
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1985-10-18· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Gould
  California Supreme Court· 1960-08-23· cited 210×
• Commonwealth v. Saunders
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1956-09-24· cited 88×
• Commonwealth v. Waller
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-04-30· cited 58×
• Commonwealth v. Dugan
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-12-28· cited 24×
• Commonwealth v. Sanders
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-11-22· cited 22×
• Commonwealth v. Brown
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-07-30· cited 22×
• Commonwealth v. Dean
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-05-28· cited 20×
• Commonwealth v. French
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-05-27· cited 3×