Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 9/21/1984
Commonwealth v. Fernandez
Citations
- 482 A.2d 567
- 333 Pa. Super. 279
- 1984 Pa. Super. LEXIS 6077
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendant not prejudiced by witness’ statement that was neither intentionally elicited nor exploited by the prosecutor
- not error for trial court to require defendant to shave his beard so as to facilitate identification by Commonwealth witness
- a defendant can be compelled to shave his beard for identification by a witness
- privilege against self-incrimination afforded by Fifth Amendment of United States Constitution and Article I, Section 9 of Pennsylvania Constitution excludes only evidence that is testimonial in nature not incriminating demonstrative or physical evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Olszewski, Popovich, Cercone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. LyonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-09-22· cited 520×
- Commonwealth v. PoindexterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-08-25· cited 78×
- People v. HamptonSupreme Court of Colorado· 1988-06-13· cited 50×
- Commonwealth v. ConwaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-10-23· cited 43×
- Commonwealth v. BruderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-07-21· cited 29×
- Commonwealth v. VazquezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-11-16· cited 28×
- Commonwealth v. HayesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-04-17· cited 16×
- Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-05-16· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-03-02· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. AnthonySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-07-19· cited 11×
- McDonough v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-12-29· cited 9×
- People v. RosadoNew York Supreme Court· 1992-02-13· cited 3×
- Commonwealth v. PethSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-05-18· cited 3×
- Commonwealth v. BarudAlleghany County Court of Common Pleas· 1994-09-19
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 3,395×
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1952-01-02· cited 3,286×
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1970-06-22· cited 1,740×
- Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court· 1973-06-11· cited 827×
- Commonwealth v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-06-28· cited 242×
- United States v. Robert Joseph SatterfieldNinth Circuit· 1978-03-22· cited 99×
- Luis Albert Alicea v. John R. Gagnon, Superintendent, and the Attorney General of WisconsinSeventh Circuit· 1982-04-14· cited 99×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-01-28· cited 78×
- United States v. LambTenth Circuit· 1978-05-17· cited 46×
- Commonwealth v. SeigristSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-04-13· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. VecchiolliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1966-11-17· cited 33×
- Commonwealth v. CraftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-03-26· cited 29×
- Commonwealth v. KrasnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-03-06· cited 29×
- Commonwealth v. TomeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-03-16· cited 26×
- Commonwealth v. RichbourgSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-11-22· cited 19×
- Commonwealth v. UrbinaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-08-21· cited 14×
- Andrews v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-10-28· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. OglesbySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-01-25· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.