Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 10/12/1971
Commonwealth v. Ferguson
Citations
- 444 Pa. 478
- 282 A.2d 378
- 1971 Pa. LEXIS 817
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that rewarning was not necessary when a different officer than the one that gave the warnings conducted the interrogation
- rewarning not necessary when warnings were given seven and one-half hours and three hours before interrogation and in the same room, but while different officer conducted the interrogation with warning officer present
- rewarning not necessary when warnings were given seven and one-half hours and three hours before interrogation and in the same room, but while different officer conducted the interrogation with warning officer present
- Miranda warnings given seven and a half and three hours prior to new interrogation of a sixteen-year-old held sufficient.
- Three hour time lapse, no location change, warning officer present when statement elicited, slight change from earlier statement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell, Jones, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Barbieri
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-03-13· cited 237×
- Commonwealth. v. HossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-10-12· cited 129×
- Commonwealth v. RodgersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-04-28· cited 127×
- Washington v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1984-11-30· cited 77×
- Commonwealth v. RigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-05-04· cited 63×
- Commonwealth v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-06-19· cited 57×
- Commonwealth v. BennettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-10-12· cited 47×
- Commonwealth v. WidemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-03-18· cited 37×
- Commonwealth v. GraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-07-08· cited 33×
- Commonwealth v. ProctorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-01-16· cited 28×
- Commonwealth v. HammondSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-12-10· cited 27×
- Commonwealth v. CohenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-09-11· cited 25×
- Commonwealth v. UpchurchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-08-07· cited 23×
- State v. BeaulieuSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1976-06-30· cited 19×
- United States v. VasquezM.D. Pennsylvania· 1995-06-13· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. DixonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-12-01· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. ParksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-09-19· cited 9×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1972-11-20· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. FrisbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-03-16· cited 7×
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-03-29· cited 7×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- William Lee Miller v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1968-06-27· cited 73×
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa· 1968-04-09· cited 33×
- United States v. Herbert Arthur OsterburgNinth Circuit· 1970-06-22· cited 29×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1969-04-23· cited 26×
- Franklin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1969-04-23· cited 26×
- Sossamon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1968-10-07· cited 9×
- People v. LongCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1968-06-26· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.