Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 6/24/1999
Commonwealth v. Faulkner
Citations
- 735 A.2d 67
- 557 Pa. 531
- 1999 Pa. LEXIS 1840
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing the cognizability of an ineffectiveness claim under the Post-Conviction Relief Act in terms of whether it affected Appellant's \guilt of the death penalty\
- discussing the cognizability of an ineffectiveness claim under the Post-Conviction Relief Act in terms of whether it affected Appellant’s “guilt of the death penalty”
- an issue may not be relitigated merely because a new or different theory is posited as a basis for re-examining an issue that has already been decided
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cappy, Flaherty, Zappala, Gappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-06-09· cited 2,071×
- Commonwealth v. TravagliaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-06-23· cited 541×
- Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-05-20· cited 191×
- Commonwealth v. ChesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-06-24· cited 171×
- Homrich v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-02-20· cited 107×
- Commonwealth v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-07-16· cited 106×
- Commonwealth v. DanielsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-07-27· cited 97×
- Commonwealth v. BasemoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-11-16· cited 91×
- Commonwealth v. BeasleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-06-18· cited 80×
- People v. SirnoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1989-06-12· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.