Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Epps

Citations

  • 474 Mass. 743
  • 53 N.E.3d 1247

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “a medical diagnosis of [abusive head trauma] is made only after consideration of all clinical data,” and that pediatricians “have a responsibility to consider alternative hypotheses when presented with a patient with findings suggestive of [abusive head trauma]”
  • \an evaluation of trial counsel's performance involves weighing the strength of an asserted defense 'relative to the availability and strength of other potential defenses'\
  • extent of necessary investigation depends on viability of potential defense relative to availability and strength of other potential defenses
  • ineffective assistance where trial counsel did not pursue third-party culprit defense and failed to rebut expert medical testimony with evidence that child's injuries may have been accidental
  • \Commonwealth's medical expert offered the opinion that injuries of the type and severity suffered by the child could not have been caused by the short falls described by the defendant\
  • trial counsel's failure to consult and call expert to rebut 3 the credibility of alleged victims' disclosures in child sexual abuse cases. See Commonwealth v. Andrade, 98 Mass. App. Ct. 395, 399 (2020

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gants, Spina, Cordy, Botsford, Duffly, Hines

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.