Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 7/12/1978
Commonwealth v. Durham
Citations
- 389 A.2d 108
- 255 Pa. Super. 539
- 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3045
Judges: Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Cercone, Price, Van Voort Spaeth, Van Voort
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Matter of SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-04-20· cited 47×
- Commonwealth v. KocherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-02-13· cited 34×
- In re D.D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-09-24· cited 19×
- In re Tyvonne M.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-05-09· cited 19×
- In Re William A.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-10-13· cited 17×
- In the Interest of WoodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-05-16· cited 8×
- In re D.A.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2008-11-26· cited 8×
- Jennings v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 1980-05-30· cited 7×
- In the Interest of E.J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-09-05· cited 6×
- Gammons v. BerlatArizona Supreme Court· 1985-03-08· cited 4×
- In re KalvinNew York Family Court· 1979-04-25· cited 4×
- State v. QDWashington Supreme Court· 1984-06-14
- In Re DDSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-09-24
- In Re DaCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2008-11-26
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court· 1967-05-15· cited 5,473×
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court· 1975-06-09· cited 3,396×
- Commonwealth v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1959-05-08· cited 95×
- Commonwealth v. CropperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-10-03· cited 92×
- Terry AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-05-04· cited 66×
- Nagle v. Allegheny Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1879-01-06· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. ZietzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1950-03-20· cited 30×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.