Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2/1/1991

Commonwealth v. Diehl

Citations

585 A.2d 1112
402 Pa. Super. 12
1991 Pa. Super. LEXIS 206

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding evidence sufficient for jury to infer appellant was part of conspiracy where appellant was present when co-defendants discussed robbery plan, drove them to and from the store that was robbed, and housed stolen merchandise in his car
evidence that co-conspirators discussed proposed burglary of store in defendant’s presence and that defendant drove the others to and from the scene of the crime was sufficient to sustain the defendant’s conspiracy conviction
error of constitutional magnitude does not prompt reversal unless it was not harmless

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Montemuro, Tamilia, Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.