Commonwealth v. Diaz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding for an evidentiary hearing on claim that neither counsel nor court recognized at time of sentence that defendant would be ineligible for boot camp but plea had included a recommendation for boot camp
• “The law does not require that appellant be pleased with the outcome of his decision to enter a plea of guilty[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Bedell
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-07-28· cited 215×
• Commonwealth v. Lukyanchikov
  Bucks County Court of Common Pleas· 2008-08-25
• Commonwealth v. McKinley
  Crawford County Court of Common Pleas· 2010-02-02
• Commonwealth v. Lowery
  Crawford County Court of Common Pleas· 2009-09-29

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Travaglia
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-06-23· cited 541×
• Commonwealth v. Hickman
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-05-15· cited 455×
• Commonwealth v. Miller
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-07-02· cited 207×
• Commonwealth v. Wallace
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-01-22· cited 96×
• Commonwealth v. Lewis
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-03-02· cited 84×
• Kang v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-06-02· cited 30×
• Commonwealth v. Williams
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-04-22· cited 24×
• Commonwealth v. Patterson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-01-27· cited 16×