Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Davis

Citations

  • 188 A.3d 454

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reiterating that “a [Superior Court] panel must adhere to the precedents that this Court’s prior panels have handed down”
  • stating under the doctrine of stare decisis, a panel of this Court must adhere to the precedents this Court’s prior panels have handed down
  • stating under the doctrine of stare decisis, a panel of this Court must adhere to the precedents this Court’s prior panels have handed down
  • reversing suppression court’s probable cause finding for vehicle search where court acknowledged only one fact weighing against probable cause and ignored all other facts that weighed heavily against probable cause
  • “‘When a court is faced with a plurality opinion, usually only the result carries precedential weight; the reasoning does not.’”
  • “When a court is faced with a plurality opinion, usually only the result carries precedential weight; the reasoning does not.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bender, Kunselman, Lazarus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.