Commonwealth v. Crosby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[t]he excited utterance exception includes statements made in response to questioning as well as those made shortly after the event. . . .” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Provenzano
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-07-27· cited 152×
• Commonwealth v. Fremd
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-09-15· cited 37×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Tuladziecki
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-03-10· cited 739×
• Commonwealth v. Valette
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-09-18· cited 223×
• Commonwealth v. Coleman
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-10-16· cited 88×
• Commonwealth v. Namack
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-08-02· cited 68×
• Commonwealth v. Lester
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-12-22· cited 45×
• Commonwealth v. Chamberlain
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-06-11· cited 44×
• Commonwealth v. Ahlborn
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-03-06· cited 34×
• Commonwealth v. Huckleberry
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-08-31· cited 15×
• Commonwealth v. DeBerry
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-08-29· cited 1×