Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1/29/1976
Commonwealth v. Crawford
Citations
- 352 A.2d 52
- 466 Pa. 269
- 1976 Pa. LEXIS 467
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- eontemnor stated he would not testify, though he did not actually refuse to answer questions in open court
- contemnor stated he would not testify though he did not actually refuse to answer questions in open court
- “[T]he summary conviction for contempt of court of a witness who was not represented by counsel cannot stand[.]”
- “[T]he summary conviction for contempt of court of a witness who was not represented by counsel cannot stand[.]”
- contemnor stated he would not testify though he did not actually refuse to answer questions in open court
- contemnor stated he would not testify though he did not actually refuse to answer questions in open court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Moody, K.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-10-27· cited 37×
- Commonwealth v. StricklerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-10-05· cited 26×
- State v. CaseNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1983-07-12· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. ReidSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-07-02· cited 20×
- Brooks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-12-12· cited 19×
- Commonwealth v. MoodySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-05-15· cited 19×
- Thompson v. ThompsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-05-26· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-02-03· cited 14×
- Vito v. VitoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-12-13· cited 12×
- In re November, 1975 Special Investigating Grand JurySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-10-28· cited 10×
- Pitts v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1980-09-17· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. EdwardsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-12-31· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. TiradoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-12-21· cited 5×
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Ivery, B.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-10-27
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Archie, B.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-10-27
- In Re: Order Amedning Rules 140, 141 & 142 of PA Rules of Criminal ProcedureSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-01-02
- Angelo v. YurkoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-07-20
- St. Angelo v. YurkoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-07-20
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court· 1974-06-26· cited 12,327×
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1932-11-07· cited 4,979×
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court· 1970-04-06· cited 3,248×
- In Re OliverSupreme Court· 1948-03-08· cited 2,065×
- Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court· 1967-11-13· cited 1,589×
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 1,167×
- Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-04-13· cited 880×
- Taylor v. HayesSupreme Court· 1974-06-26· cited 663×
- Ex Parte TerrySupreme Court· 1888-11-12· cited 567×
- Codispoti v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1974-06-26· cited 370×
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1965-12-06· cited 344×
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1975-05-19· cited 308×
- Johnson v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1971-06-14· cited 208×
- Groppi v. LeslieSupreme Court· 1972-01-13· cited 205×
- In Re Robert Reginald KilgoFourth Circuit· 1973-09-06· cited 113×
- Moore v. JamiesonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-03-19· cited 70×
- Commonwealth ex rel. Goodfellow v. RundleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1964-11-10· cited 70×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.