Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Collins

Citations

  • 627 N.E.2d 941
  • 36 Mass. App. Ct. 25
  • 1994 Mass. App. LEXIS 127

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • without affidavits, no way to determine whether prospective witnesses’ testimony would likely have made material difference
  • without affidavits from prospective witnesses, motion judge unable to determine \whether their testimony would likely have made a material difference\
  • defendant’s failure to append new trial motion affidavits of potential witnesses precluded motion judge from ruling on ineffective assistance claim
  • without affidavits from witnesses not interviewed, \the judge was 'unable to rule on the question of whether [the witnesses'] testimony would likely have made a material difference'\
  • withoutaffidavits, noway to determine whether prospective witness’ testimony would likely have made material difference
  • where trial counsel made diligent, albeit unsuccessful, efforts to locate a key defense witness who had no street address, bis representation was not ineffective under Commonwealth v. Saferian, 366 Mass. 89, 96 [1974]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dreben, Smith, Greenberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.