Commonwealth v. Salcedo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is evident from the transcript that the judge believed the . . . officer was qualified, and his allowing the testimony implies he made that finding”
• “defendant’s one-sentence paragraph alleging error . . . does not rise to the level of appellate argument”
• “It is evident from the transcript that the judge believed the . . . officer was qualified, and his allowing the testimony implies he made that finding”
• “defendant’s one-sentence paragraph alleging error . . . does not rise to the level of appellate argument”
• one-sentence paragraph alleging error “does not rise to the level of appellate argument, as required by Mass.R.A.P. 16[a][4], as amended, 367 Mass. 921 [1975]”
• “It is evident from the transcript that the judge believed the . . . officer was qualified, and his allowing the testimony implies he made that finding”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).