Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 3/29/1985
Commonwealth v. Coleman
Citations
- 341 Pa. Super. 160
- 491 A.2d 200
- 1985 Pa. Super. LEXIS 6755
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Commonwealth’s interlocutory appeal did not violate Rule 600 when the Commonwealth had a right to appeal that would be moot after trial and there was no evidence that the Commonwealth took the appeal as a delay tactic
- holding that Commonwealth's interlocutory appeal did not violate Rule 600 when the Commonwealth had a right to appeal that would be moot after trial and there was no evidence that the Commonwealth took the appeal as a delay tactic
- finding that Commonwealth’s unsuccessful two-year interlocutory appeal to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania tolled the speedy trial rule time, when such appeal was taken for tactical reasons and not for delay
- finding Commonwealth’s unsuccessful two-year interlocutory appeal to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania tolled the speedy trial rule time, when such appeal was taken for tactical reasons and not for delay
- finding Commonwealth’s unsuccessful two-year interlocutory appeal to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania tolled the speedy trial rule time, when such appeal was taken for tactical reasons and not for delay
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lipez, Rowley, Sole
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- Commonwealth v. PoundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-07-03· cited 144×
- Jones v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-09-24· cited 68×
- Commonwealth v. GloverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-04-27· cited 42×
- Commonwealth v. WhartonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-09-24· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.