Commonwealth v. Ferri

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that four-year delay for Commonwealth’s appeal of a denied motion for severance did not violate Rule 600
• holding that four-year delay for Commonwealth's appeal of a denied motion for severance did not violate Rule 600
• holding that four-year delay for Commonwealth’s appeal of a denied motion for severance did not violate Rule 600
• finding that admission of former counsel’s testimony was proper, where privileged communications were disclosed only to extent necessary to authenticate and establish chain of custody of non-privileged physical evidence
• finding that admission of former counsel's testimony was proper, where privileged communications were disclosed only to extent necessary to authenticate and establish chain of custody of non-privileged physical evidence
• finding entire four-year delay incident to Commonwealth’s appeal was properly excluded after this Court affirmed order severing charges and Supreme Court denied Commonwealth’s petition for allowance of appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).