Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Coleman

Citations

  • 383 A.2d 1268
  • 477 Pa. 400
  • 1978 Pa. LEXIS 905

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • continuances should only be granted for specified time periods in order to avoid a problem in calculating 180-day violations
  • continuances should only be granted for specified time periods in order to avoid a problem in calculating 180-day violations
  • failure to file Rule 1100(f) petition or to oppose Commonwealth’s petition to extend
  • plurality opinion, two justices concurring in result
  • plurality opinion, two justices concurring in result
  • plurality opinion, two justices concurring in result

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino, Packet, Packel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

72 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.