Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Clark

Citations

  • 761 A.2d 190
  • 2000 Pa. Super. 307
  • 2000 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3009
  • 2000 WL 1528686

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that police station is a “detention facility” for the purposes of aggravated harassment by a prisoner
  • finding substantial force necessary where arrestee “assumed a fighting stance” and fled when sprayed with pepper spray, requiring pursuing officer to “chase him down traffic lanes”
  • finding substantial force necessary where arrestee \assumed a fighting stance\ and fled when sprayed with pepper spray, requiring pursuing officer to \chase him down traffic lanes\
  • noting where Clark took an aggressive stance, ran down the road, and the officer had to pepper spray him before he could arrest him was sufficient evidence for resisting arrest
  • sustaining the appellant’s conviction for resisting arrest when the evidence demonstrated that the appellant “took a fighting stance, the officer had to pepper spray [him], and then chase him down traffic lanes before apprehending him”
  • finding sufficient evidence in support of conviction for resisting arrest where the defendant, upon being informed that he was under arrest, “assumed a fighting stance,” was pepper sprayed, ran from police, slipped and fell, and then continued to resist while on the ground

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cavanaugh, Sole, Tamilia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.