Massachusetts Appeals Court· 6/28/1999
Commonwealth v. Choice
Citations
- 47 Mass. App. Ct. 907
- 711 N.E.2d 938
- 1999 Mass. App. LEXIS 698
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “stronger reason to disclose the identity of [an informant] who, the authorities claim, has participated in the crime”
- “ritualistic objection” not necessary where matter was adequately called to judge’s attention and judge ruled adversely
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. MadiganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2007-08-13· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. YoungworthMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2002-06-03· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. FigueroaMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2009-08-07· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. WynterMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2002-06-26· cited 5×
- Commonwealth v. CarnellMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2001-12-07· cited 2×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-03-25· cited 3,599×
- Commonwealth v. SwensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1975-06-30· cited 89×
- Commonwealth v. DouzanisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1981-08-21· cited 65×
- Commonwealth v. LugoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1990-01-25· cited 53×
- Commonwealth v. EnnisMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1973-10-03· cited 43×
- Commonwealth v. GrenierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1993-07-07· cited 37×
- Commonwealth v. HernandezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1995-11-08· cited 27×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.