Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 9/13/2001
Commonwealth v. Champney
Citations
- 783 A.2d 837
- 2001 Pa. Super. 272
- 2001 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2664
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a requested notice of appeal, leaving the petitioner without any opportunity to appeal and entitling him to nunc pro tunc relief
- holding trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a requested notice of appeal, leaving the petitioner without any opportunity to appeal and entitling him to nunc pro tunc relief
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sole, Cavanaugh, Cercone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-07-27· cited 4,184×
- Commonwealth v. LantzySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-07-07· cited 472×
- Commonwealth v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-05-25· cited 279×
- Commonwealth v. HarmonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-09-17· cited 112×
- Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-02-24· cited 110×
- Commonwealth v. KeysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-09-28· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. RomanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-11-03· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.