Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Castro

Citations

  • 766 A.2d 1283
  • 2001 Pa. Super. 17
  • 2001 Pa. Super. LEXIS 13

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that clerk of courts erred by forwarding a pro se petition to the defendant’s former counsel after the direct appeal process had ended
  • holding that the prisoner mailbox rule provides that the date of delivery of a court filing by the defendant or PCRA petitioner to the proper prison authority or to a prison mailbox is considered the date of filing
  • holding document deemed filed by prisoner when delivered to prison authorities for mailing
  • filing focuses upon litigant’s placement of document in hands of appropriate officer; hence, Appellant’s envelope bearing postmark of December 27, 2019 demonstrated a timely filing
  • filing of second petition triggered inquiry into never- docketed petition, which was held still pending
  • explaining that the prisoner mailbox rule extends to PCRA proceedings and provides that the date of delivery of the mailing by the defendant to the proper prison authority or to a prison mailbox is considered the date of filing of the petition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seven, Cavanaugh, Stevens, Brosky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.