Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1/16/2001
Commonwealth v. Castro
Citations
- 766 A.2d 1283
- 2001 Pa. Super. 17
- 2001 Pa. Super. LEXIS 13
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that clerk of courts erred by forwarding a pro se petition to the defendant’s former counsel after the direct appeal process had ended
- holding that the prisoner mailbox rule provides that the date of delivery of a court filing by the defendant or PCRA petitioner to the proper prison authority or to a prison mailbox is considered the date of filing
- holding document deemed filed by prisoner when delivered to prison authorities for mailing
- filing focuses upon litigant’s placement of document in hands of appropriate officer; hence, Appellant’s envelope bearing postmark of December 27, 2019 demonstrated a timely filing
- filing of second petition triggered inquiry into never- docketed petition, which was held still pending
- explaining that the prisoner mailbox rule extends to PCRA proceedings and provides that the date of delivery of the mailing by the defendant to the proper prison authority or to a prison mailbox is considered the date of filing of the petition
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Seven, Cavanaugh, Stevens, Brosky
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Pabon v. MahanoyThird Circuit· 2011-07-12· cited 327×
- Robert Jenkins v. Superintendent Laurel HighlandThird Circuit· 2013-01-15· cited 302×
- Commonwealth v. LeggettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-02-28· cited 143×
- Commonwealth v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-11-13· cited 113×
- Kittrell v. WatsonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-04-02· cited 104×
- Commonwealth v. HopferSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-01-28· cited 34×
- Griffin v. Central Sprinkler Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-04-25· cited 26×
- Pettibone v. Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-08-16· cited 19×
- Commonwealth v. HolmesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-07-31· cited 16×
- Dumas, L. v. Brooks, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-12-31· cited 3×
- Satterfield v. JohnsonE.D. Pennsylvania· 2002-09-06· cited 2×
- Commonwealth v. PlummerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-05-08· cited 1×
- Order Adopting New Rules 576.1 and Amending Rules 113, 114 & 576 of Pa.R.Crim.ProSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-01-25
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court· 1988-06-24· cited 6,563×
- Fallen v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 244×
- Commonwealth v. JermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-10-31· cited 107×
- Commonwealth v. LittleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-09-08· cited 93×
- Commonwealth v. QuailSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-03-24· cited 56×
- Commonwealth v. EllisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-10-09· cited 48×
- Commonwealth v. KeysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-09-28· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. FralicSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-05-28· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. GinglardiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-08-04· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.