Commonwealth v. Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The logical connection between the fact that the witness was on probation, and the inference to be drawn, that the witness might be biased toward the state, is clear and direct.”
• The logical connection between the fact that the witness was on probation, and the inference to be drawn, that the witness might be biased toward the state, is clear and direct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-10-18· cited 11×
• Commonwealth v. Gay
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-01-04· cited 9×
• Commonwealth v. Bryner
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-02-26· cited 3×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Davis v. Alaska
  Supreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
• Pointer v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
• Douglas v. Alabama
  Supreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 1,939×
• Greene v. McElroy
  Supreme Court· 1959-06-29· cited 1,385×
• Commonwealth v. Slaughter
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-11-18· cited 100×
• Commonwealth v. Katchmer
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-09-19· cited 74×
• Commonwealth v. Dombrauskas
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-01-18· cited 38×
• Strickler v. United Elevator Co., Inc.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-07-12· cited 32×
• Commonwealth v. Pilosky
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-03-29· cited 27×
• Policino v. Ehrlich
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-04-28· cited 18×
• Commonwealth Ex Rel. Bulson v. Bulson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-05-16· cited 14×
• Doner v. Jowitt and Rodgers Co.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-03-16· cited 11×