Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Carrion

Citations

  • 431 Mass. 44
  • 725 N.E.2d 196
  • 2000 Mass. LEXIS 110

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting a defendant’s vagueness and ambiguity arguments where the phrase, “any escape from custody of the department,” was “within common understanding”
  • rule of lenity requires that ambiguous language in penal statute be construed in favor of defendant
  • “The rule of lenity does not require, however, that absent an ambiguity we construe a penal statute most favorably to a defendant”
  • rule of lenity requires that defendant receive benefit of ambiguous statutory language
  • rule of lenity requires that defendant receive benefit of ambiguous statutory language

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.