Commonwealth v. Cahill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “If the Legislature had intended for the amended paragraphs of [the statute] governing license revocation to apply to second offenders ... it easily could have included language to that effect”
• Legislature could have, but did not, impose standard other than that provided in statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Scott v. NG US 1, Inc.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2008-03-07· cited 57×
• Commonwealth v. Hendricks
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2008-07-31· cited 34×
• Commonwealth v. McMullen
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2018-04-25
• Rosenthal v. Registrar of Motor Vehicles
  Massachusetts Superior Court· 2009-11-19

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Woodward
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1998-06-16· cited 111×
• Dunbrack v. Commonwealth
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1986-10-16· cited 36×
• Commonwealth v. Molino
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1991-11-04· cited 30×
• Commonwealth v. Carrion
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2000-03-13· cited 24×
• Healy v. First District Court
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1975-05-21· cited 16×
• Daley v. Board of Appeal on Motor Vehicle Liability Policies & Bonds
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1990-03-08· cited 6×
• Commonwealth v. Valiton
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2000-11-17· cited 6×
• Commonwealth v. Callen
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1988-06-28· cited 5×
• Commonwealth v. Bergquist
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2001-02-23· cited 2×