Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Campbell

Citations

  • 807 S.E.2d 735
  • 294 Va. 486

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the United States Supreme Court has “consistently eschewed bright-line rules, instead emphasizing the fact-specific nature of the reasonableness inquiry” (quoting Ohio v. Robinette, 519 U.S. 33, 39 (1996))
  • expressing “no opinion concerning the existence or scope of any suppression remedy under Code § 19.2-54”
  • “Despite the absence of a warrant, . . . police may lawfully enter a home . . . if they have probable cause coupled with exigent circumstances.”
  • “We conclude, as have a number of other courts, that the procurement of a defective warrant does not require suppression if the search is nonetheless justified on an alternate ground.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: STEPHEN McCULLOUGH

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.