Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 9/30/2016

Commonwealth v. Campbell

Citations

475 Mass. 611
59 N.E.3d 394

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“Whether a defendant has a reasonable expec tation of privacy may not be challenged for the first time on appeal by the Commonwealth . . .”
no basis to continue motor vehicle stop, despite absence of driver's name on rental agreement, where driver produced valid driver's license and informed officer that renter provided permission
\absence of the defendant's name on the rental agreement provided [the officer] with a basis to investigate whether the authorized renter had permitted the defendant to use the vehicle\
suppression not required where Commonwealth can demonstrate that discovery of evidence by lawful means was certain and police did not act in bad faith to accelerate discovery
\Reasonableness\ is the \touchstone\ when determining the propriety of a warrantless seizure.
“Reasonableness” is the “touchstone” when determining the propriety of a warrantless seizure.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gants, Spina, Cordy, Botsford, Duffly, Lenk

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.