Commonwealth v. Caesar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• guilty knowledge would be “conjectural at best” where the theft of an automobile was four weeks prior and the defendant was in jail at that time
• guilty knowledge would be \conjectural at best\ where theft of automobile occurred four weeks prior
• “guilty knowledge would be - 17 - J-S11033-21 knowledge that they were being kept in a location close to where they had been stolen. See Robinson, 128 A.3d at 268; Commonwealth v. Phillips, 392 A.2d 708, 709-10 (Pa. Super. 1978

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Robinson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-11-19· cited 77×
• Commonwealth v. Utter
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-08-01· cited 12×
• Commonwealth v. Williams
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-02-06· cited 8×
• Commonwealth v. Robinson
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-07-22· cited 7×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Shaffer
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-03-20· cited 213×
• Commonwealth v. Ilgenfritz
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-03-17· cited 129×
• Commonwealth v. Henderson
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-05-04· cited 93×
• Commonwealth v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-07-27· cited 82×
• Commonwealth v. Grant
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-06-24· cited 44×
• Waldron Appeal
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-12-01· cited 11×
• Commonwealth v. Cross
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-03-31· cited 4×