Commonwealth v. Utter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Appellant’s intent may be established by circumstantial evidence since there is rarely any direct evidence of one’s subjective state of mind.” (citation omitted)
• “Appellant’s intent may be established by circumstantial evidence since there is rarely any direct evidence of one’s subjective state of mind.” (citation omitted)
• evidence sufficient to infer recklessness where appellant was unable to produce license or registration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).