Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 8/14/1996

Commonwealth v. Butler

Citations

423 Mass. 517
668 N.E.2d 832
1996 Mass. LEXIS 206

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

appellate court considers uncontroverted testimony that “in no way contradicts] the motion judge’s findings [but] merely fill[s] out the narrative”
appellate court considers uncontroverted testimony that ‘in no way contradicts] the motion judge’s findings [but] merely fill[s] out the narrative’
appellate court considers uncontroverted testimony that ‘in no way contradicts] the motion judge’s findings [but] merely fill[s] out the narrative’
appropriate to supplement testimony that \in no way contradict[s] the motion judge's findings . . . [but] merely fill[s] out the narrative\
delay in presentment or other police misconduct may justify suppression as deterrent
we use uncontroverted facts that do not contradict judge’s findings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fried, Liacos

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.